September 6, 2012
- 188 Gaming
- 188I Gambling Contracts and Transactions
- 188I(A) Nature and Validity
- 188k3 k. Constitutional and Statutory Provisions.
Prohibition against use of any device for various gaming purposes was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to petitioner wearing computer shoes to compute advantage or disadvantage with house in blackjack game, to advise him of remaining cards in deck, and to signal whether to hit, stand, double down, or split.
Sheriff, Clark County, Nev. v. Anderson, 746 P.2d 643 (Nev. 1987)
Suggested by Ben Frisch, Senior Attorney Editor, Thomson Reuters